link:
http://xkcdsucks.blogspot.com/2010/02/xkcd-store-update.html
Oh no, he takes some rather great graphic illustrations, and sell them as posters, which there probably is a big demand for! Karl Marx was right, surely this must be a sign of the imminent demise of the screwed up capitalistic system.
Ok, good point about the Radiohead thing. That was indeed lame.
But then you go and forget to mention that the whole Primer graph was one big rip-off!
http://www.freeweb.hu/neuwanstein/primer_timeline.html
mandag den 22. februar 2010
onsdag den 17. februar 2010
Comic 703: Lame critique is lame critique
link:
http://xkcdsucks.blogspot.com/2010/02/comic-703-title-of-post.html
Who cares if the honor society isn't a perfect tautology in all cases. In many ways it is, and that's really enough for a comic, isn't it? Jesus.
Also, who cares if comments about "if x joins my facebook group" were bigger some years ago. How is that even relevant?
Just say it like it is:
It is like this.
http://xkcdsucks.blogspot.com/2010/02/comic-703-title-of-post.html
Who cares if the honor society isn't a perfect tautology in all cases. In many ways it is, and that's really enough for a comic, isn't it? Jesus.
Also, who cares if comments about "if x joins my facebook group" were bigger some years ago. How is that even relevant?
Just say it like it is:
It is like this.
mandag den 15. februar 2010
702: I have heard of annoying criticism
link:
http://xkcdsucks.blogspot.com/2010/02/placeholder.html
Lame critique of the knight movement. It's a knight, the chess piece. A real knight moving as a chess piece would just be stupid.
"On a scale of one "meh" to five, I rate this comic the wholly unremarkable number of three."
What the hell does this even mean? Is that better or worse than 2 mehs? Obviously, if you are only rating the comics in a scala of mehs, you will never like them. And this is one is actually quite good.
http://xkcdsucks.blogspot.com/2010/02/placeholder.html
Lame critique of the knight movement. It's a knight, the chess piece. A real knight moving as a chess piece would just be stupid.
"On a scale of one "meh" to five, I rate this comic the wholly unremarkable number of three."
What the hell does this even mean? Is that better or worse than 2 mehs? Obviously, if you are only rating the comics in a scala of mehs, you will never like them. And this is one is actually quite good.
tirsdag den 26. januar 2010
693: Suspension of ability to enjoy things
link:
http://xkcdsucks.blogspot.com/2010/01/comic-693-suspension-of-belief.html
This one exemplifies everything I hate about xkcd sucks. Yes, the subject for the comic has been seen before. But it's an angle I haven't heard of before, and is actually quite interesting. What is that you want, for xkcd to invent a brand new topic for humour with every single comic? That's a serious question. It sounds to me like that is what you want.
Also, your beloved Dinosaur comic could easily make a similar joke, it would just be wrapped in a wall of text, and only lame dinosaurs to look at.
http://xkcdsucks.blogspot.com/2010/01/comic-693-suspension-of-belief.html
This one exemplifies everything I hate about xkcd sucks. Yes, the subject for the comic has been seen before. But it's an angle I haven't heard of before, and is actually quite interesting. What is that you want, for xkcd to invent a brand new topic for humour with every single comic? That's a serious question. It sounds to me like that is what you want.
Also, your beloved Dinosaur comic could easily make a similar joke, it would just be wrapped in a wall of text, and only lame dinosaurs to look at.
søndag den 3. januar 2010
xkcd sucks: it's boring, bitches.
link:
http://xkcdsucks.blogspot.com/2010/01/comic-683-science-its-boring-bitches.html
Science can't be cool, if it moves along at a realistic speed? Is that what you are saying. Because otherwise I don't understand what you are saying. Also, you could be more succinct.
And again, with the critic of the theme. Who cares if it's an old topic for humour? I get the feeling, that if you are watching a comedy with Carl, he will be sitting the whole time "Oh, a relationship joke. THATS original."
http://xkcdsucks.blogspot.com/2010/01/comic-683-science-its-boring-bitches.html
Science can't be cool, if it moves along at a realistic speed? Is that what you are saying. Because otherwise I don't understand what you are saying. Also, you could be more succinct.
And again, with the critic of the theme. Who cares if it's an old topic for humour? I get the feeling, that if you are watching a comedy with Carl, he will be sitting the whole time "Oh, a relationship joke. THATS original."
onsdag den 16. december 2009
676: Good Effort
link:
http://xkcdsucks.blogspot.com/2009/12/comic-676-wasted-effort.html
The xkcd sucks comic was hilarious. More of this!
http://xkcdsucks.blogspot.com/2009/12/comic-676-wasted-effort.html
The xkcd sucks comic was hilarious. More of this!
torsdag den 12. november 2009
661: Learning from xkcd sucks
link:
http://xkcdsucks.blogspot.com/2009/11/well-once-again-we-learn-that-xkcd-is.html
Kudos to xkcd sucks for this one. They point out the true flaws in the strip, suggest an alternative thats far superior. And on top of that they point out the curious fact that all the smarter / better characters in xkcd are women. And the whole editing post was great too. This is what I come to the site for.
http://xkcdsucks.blogspot.com/2009/11/well-once-again-we-learn-that-xkcd-is.html
Kudos to xkcd sucks for this one. They point out the true flaws in the strip, suggest an alternative thats far superior. And on top of that they point out the curious fact that all the smarter / better characters in xkcd are women. And the whole editing post was great too. This is what I come to the site for.
Abonner på:
Opslag (Atom)