link:
http://xkcdsucks.blogspot.com/2010/02/xkcd-store-update.html
Oh no, he takes some rather great graphic illustrations, and sell them as posters, which there probably is a big demand for! Karl Marx was right, surely this must be a sign of the imminent demise of the screwed up capitalistic system.
Ok, good point about the Radiohead thing. That was indeed lame.
But then you go and forget to mention that the whole Primer graph was one big rip-off!
http://www.freeweb.hu/neuwanstein/primer_timeline.html
mandag den 22. februar 2010
onsdag den 17. februar 2010
Comic 703: Lame critique is lame critique
link:
http://xkcdsucks.blogspot.com/2010/02/comic-703-title-of-post.html
Who cares if the honor society isn't a perfect tautology in all cases. In many ways it is, and that's really enough for a comic, isn't it? Jesus.
Also, who cares if comments about "if x joins my facebook group" were bigger some years ago. How is that even relevant?
Just say it like it is:
It is like this.
http://xkcdsucks.blogspot.com/2010/02/comic-703-title-of-post.html
Who cares if the honor society isn't a perfect tautology in all cases. In many ways it is, and that's really enough for a comic, isn't it? Jesus.
Also, who cares if comments about "if x joins my facebook group" were bigger some years ago. How is that even relevant?
Just say it like it is:
It is like this.
mandag den 15. februar 2010
702: I have heard of annoying criticism
link:
http://xkcdsucks.blogspot.com/2010/02/placeholder.html
Lame critique of the knight movement. It's a knight, the chess piece. A real knight moving as a chess piece would just be stupid.
"On a scale of one "meh" to five, I rate this comic the wholly unremarkable number of three."
What the hell does this even mean? Is that better or worse than 2 mehs? Obviously, if you are only rating the comics in a scala of mehs, you will never like them. And this is one is actually quite good.
http://xkcdsucks.blogspot.com/2010/02/placeholder.html
Lame critique of the knight movement. It's a knight, the chess piece. A real knight moving as a chess piece would just be stupid.
"On a scale of one "meh" to five, I rate this comic the wholly unremarkable number of three."
What the hell does this even mean? Is that better or worse than 2 mehs? Obviously, if you are only rating the comics in a scala of mehs, you will never like them. And this is one is actually quite good.
Abonner på:
Opslag (Atom)